[Caffienater]

It does, and if you can prove me wrong, do it. This is a discussion not a rant.

[DefectiveProduct]

I agree.

Imageshack > Photobucket

[Bawt]

Duh. :tard:

[Standing]

http://www.freeimagehosting.net/

Best, Simple, beats all

[Caffienater]

Well freeimagehosting can upload bigger files, it can't upload as many types.

[tennisluvr8]

Give me a good reason why imageshack beats photobucket =)

[Skooled]

photobucket>imageshack, photobucket you can upload your pics and they will always be there and you can make folders. imageshack you upload it then its gone. But exoload.com is better than both, it can upload all file types even .psd

[Digitalicious]

Originally Posted by Skooled

photobucket>imageshack, photobucket you can upload your pics and they will always be there and you can make folders.

You can make an Imageshack account...That allows you to store your images. With Photobucket, you HAVE to make an account to upload images whereas with Imageshack, it takes just a few clicks of the mouse.

Photobucket does give enough bandwidth to it's images. Forget posting that image on a popular website from Photobucket because it only take a few minutes to max out that bandwidth. Alternatively, it takes a Digg to max out the bandwidth on an Imageshack image.

[X0G]

Imageshack > photobucket

hands down

[Heff]

Originally Posted by X0G

Imageshack > photobucket

hands down